Entry · 05

The wrong rulebook


My work runs across programmes validated by four partner universities. Four partners means four regulation sets, four assessment calendars and four sets of reporting requirements running at the same time. People assume the difficulty is volume. It is not. The difficulty is that the rulebooks resemble each other just enough to be dangerous.

The same word can carry different rules in each set. A resit here is not quite a resit there. Compensation exists in one set of circumstances under one partner and a different set under another. The calendars agree for months at a time and then quietly diverge. Nothing about the surface tells you which rulebook you are standing in.

Which is why the costliest mistake in a multi-partner office is not knowing too little. It is knowing one rulebook well and reaching for it everywhere. The quickest way to get a decision wrong is to be confident about the wrong rulebook.

The error is not ignorance. It is transfer.

Travelling taught me the same lesson in a cheaper classroom. Every country is a different rulebook, and the mistake is always the same one: assuming the procedure you already know is the procedure that applies here. Arrival makes you the novice again, whatever you knew at home. The travellers who struggle most are not the ones who know nothing. They are the ones who will not stop being experts in the wrong place.

So the discipline I hold to is simple and slightly humbling. Never answer from memory. Before a decision, name the partner, open the regulation set that governs this student, and cite the clause. Not because memory is usually wrong, but because the cost of any time it is wrong would land on someone who cannot afford it. Evidence every decision means naming the source, not just happening to be right.

It changes what expertise means. In a single-rulebook world, expertise is depth: knowing your regulations so well you rarely need to look. In a multi-partner world, expertise is knowing exactly where each rulebook ends. The skill is not the knowing. The skill is respecting the boundary.

Muhammad Hamza · Manchester